崔雲崴, 田斌, 王子妍, 冯青源, 冉志勇. 增材制造SLM工艺对Ti6Al4V表面织构成型质量的影响[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2024, (1): 26-31. DOI: 10.19287/j.mtmt.1005-2402.2024.01.003
引用本文: 崔雲崴, 田斌, 王子妍, 冯青源, 冉志勇. 增材制造SLM工艺对Ti6Al4V表面织构成型质量的影响[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2024, (1): 26-31. DOI: 10.19287/j.mtmt.1005-2402.2024.01.003
CUI Yunwei, TIAN Bin, WANG Ziyan, FENG Qingyuan, RAN Zhiyong. Effect of additive manufacturing SLM process on the shape quality of Ti6Al4V surface texture[J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2024, (1): 26-31. DOI: 10.19287/j.mtmt.1005-2402.2024.01.003
Citation: CUI Yunwei, TIAN Bin, WANG Ziyan, FENG Qingyuan, RAN Zhiyong. Effect of additive manufacturing SLM process on the shape quality of Ti6Al4V surface texture[J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2024, (1): 26-31. DOI: 10.19287/j.mtmt.1005-2402.2024.01.003

增材制造SLM工艺对Ti6Al4V表面织构成型质量的影响

Effect of additive manufacturing SLM process on the shape quality of Ti6Al4V surface texture

  • 摘要: 为了探究增材制造SLM工艺对“一步法”制备Ti6Al4V表面织构实际成型尺寸和形貌等成型质量的影响,文章采用金属3D打印机在选择性激光熔化(SLM)工艺下制备表面具有不同理论织构直径和深度的Ti6Al4V钛合金试样,观察并分析得到凹坑织构边缘和底部的未熔物随着织构直径和深度的增大而增多。随着理论织构深度增加,D400试样凹坑织构的实际直径和平均直径误差均先增加后减小,平均直径误差最小为2.08%;D800试样凹坑织构的平均直径误差呈下降趋势,最小为2.84%。而D400试样凹坑织构的平均深度误差逐渐减小,最小为2.23%;D800试样凹坑织构深度方向成型精度较低。3D打印一体成型可以在Ti6Al4V钛合金表面制备较好的凹坑织构,且实际凹坑织构在直径方向的成型质量优于深度方向。

     

    Abstract: The work aimed to explore the influence of additive manufacturing SLM process on the shape quality of actual shape size and morphology of Ti6Al4V surface texture prepared by “one-step” method. Ti6Al4V titanium alloy samples with different theorical diameters and depths of surface textures were prepared by 3D metal printer under SLM technology. The shape quality of pit texture of titanium alloys were observed and analyzed. The results showed that for the pit textures, there were some incomplete melting titanium alloy powder particles at the edge and the bottom, which increased with the increasing of the texture diameter and depth. With the increase of theorical texture depth, the actual diameter and average diameter error of D400 pit texture increased first and then decreased, with the minimum average diameter error of 2.08%. And the average diameter error of D800 pit texture showed a downward trend, with the minimum average diameter error of 2.84%. Meanwhile, with the increase of theorical texture depth, the average depth error of D400 pit texture gradually decreased, with the minimum average depth error of 2.23%. But the average shape error in depth for D800 pit texture was larger than that in diameter. As a result, it was proved that Ti6Al4V titanium alloy with surface pit texture prepared by one-step method of 3D printing was feasible. Furthermore, the shape quality of actual pit textures in the diameter direction was better than that in the depth direction.

     

/

返回文章
返回