Semi-automatic electromagnetic riveting actuator development and riveting verification of aerospace conical parts
-
摘要: 针对航天锥形筒状结构件典型的铆接特点,文章提出了用半自动化电磁铆接技术实现其高质量、长寿命连接的方案;设计了包括轴线调整机构、缓冲机构、导向机构和刹车机构的半自动化电磁铆枪系统;完成了电磁铆接后坐力测算试验,分析了电磁铆接后坐力特征,得到1 000 V电压下电磁铆接后坐力动量略小于30 N·s,可为电磁铆接缓冲机构精准设计提供支撑;完成了气动铆枪和电磁铆枪铆接强度对比试验,验证了半自动化电磁铆枪解决航天锥形件高质量、长寿命连接难题的可行性。Abstract: A semi-automated electromagnetic riveting technology was proposed to achieve high-quality and long-life connections for the typical riveting characteristics of aerospace conical cylindrical structural components; The semi-automatic electromagnetic riveting actuator system that including axis adjustment mechanism, buffer mechanism, guide mechanism and brake mechanism was designed. The impact recoil calculation test was completed and the recoil characteristics of electromagnetic riveting was analyzed. It is found that the recoil impulse of electromagnetic riveting is slightly less than 30 N·s under 1 000 V, which can provide support for the precise design of electromagnetic riveting buffer mechanisms. The comparative test on the riveting strength of ordinary pneumatic riveting and electromagnetic riveting was completed, which verifies the feasibility of semi-automatic electromagnetic riveter to solve the problem of high-quality and long-life connection of conical cylindrical structures.
-
Key words:
- electromagnetic riveting /
- conical cylinder /
- structural design /
- recoil /
- strength test
-
表 1 最大剪切力对比
序号 气动铆接 电磁铆接 1 2.82 kN 2.87 kN 2 2.75 kN 2.77 kN 3 2.58 kN 2.83 kN 4 2.75 kN 2.82 kN 5 2.61 kN 2.81 kN 平均值 2.70 kN 2.82 kN 方差 8.38×10−3 1.04×10−3 表 2 最大拉脱力对比
序号 气动铆接 电磁铆接 1 3.87 kN 4.05 kN 2 3.93 kN 3.96 kN 3 3.88 kN 3.95 kN 4 3.79 kN 4.01 kN 5 3.78 kN 3.94 kN 平均值 3.85 kN 3.98 kN 方差 3.24×10−3 1.74×10−3 -
[1] 唐伟,冯毅,杨肖峰,等. 非惯性弹道飞行器气动布局设计实践[J]. 气体物理,2017,2(1):1-12. [2] 熊健,李志彬,刘惠彬,等. 航空航天轻质复合材料壳体结构进展研究[J]. 复合材料学报,2021,38(6):1629-1650. [3] 唐晓梅,单超,梁晓康,等. 新一代运载火箭壳体的装配样板设计与应用[J]. 航天制造技术,2019(2):57-62. [4] 李可,曹增强,杨宝惠,等. 锥形件结构的半自动化电磁铆接托架[J]. 航空制造技术,2017(22):61-65. [5] Cao Z Q,Zuo Y J. Electromagnetic riveting technique and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2020,33(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.12.023 [6] Liu D H,Li B,Guo Z H,et al. Finite element analysis on electromagnetic forming of DP780 high-strength steel sheets[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2021,112(3):1-13. [7] 黄运凯,张旭,李杰,等. 电磁铆接技术国内外研究进展[J]. 精密成型工程,2021,13(5):51-57. [8] 胡思思,陈云鹤,邓将华,等. 电磁铆接加载电压对TA1铆钉绝热剪切变形的影响[J]. 塑性工程学报,2020,27(12):121-127. [9] Chen R M,Fan Z S,Huang W P ,et al. Effect of dimple structures and concave die on headless rivet deformation in electromagnetic riveting[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2017,24(5):25-31. [10] 刘敬杰,刘凯泉. 锥形筒体锻造工艺研究[J]. 大型铸锻件,2018(6):22-24. [11] 吕晓敏,杨敬涛,杨宏伟,等. 铆模锥度对无头铆钉成型质量影响分析[J]. 航空精密制造技术,2022(3):47-50. [12] 曹增强,张铭豪,谭学才,等. 航空复合材料结构铆接技术综述[J]. 航空制造技术,2023,66(1):26-37. [13] 杨晓娜,曹增强,左杨杰,等. 手持式电磁铆枪驱动头优化设计[J]. 航空精密制造技术,2021(5):43-46. [14] 李梦佳,付智辉,黄运凯,等. 电磁铆枪缓冲系统建模与分析[J]. 机械工程与技术,2021,10(3):271-280. [15] 曹增强,党成龙,杨宝惠,等. 一种半自动化电磁铆枪缓冲与导向装置:201711389136.6[P]. 2018-05-22.